478
257 shares, 478 points

Tim Walberg is currently serving his seventh term in Congress as the representative of south-central Michigan. The diverse constituency of Michigan’s 7th District encompasses Branch, Eaton, Hillsdale, Jackson, Lenawee, and Monroe Counties, along with parts of Washtenaw County. Since first taking office, Tim has hosted hundreds of coffee and town hall meetings to better understand the thoughts and concerns of the district.

Prior to his time in public office, Tim served as a pastor in Michigan and Indiana, as president of the Warren Reuther Center for Education and Community Impact, and as a division manager for Moody Bible Institute. He also served in the Michigan House of Representatives from 1983 to 1999, and is proud to bring his reputation as a principled legislator, fiscal reformer, and defender of traditional values to Washington.

Based on his record of legislative accomplishment, Tim was ranked by the Center for Effective Lawmaking, a non-partisan collaboration between Vanderbilt University and University of Virginia, as the most effective member of Michigan’s congressional delegation in the 115th Congress. In the following session of Congress, the Center for Effective Lawmaking once again recognized Tim for his policymaking success, naming him the top Republican legislator on technology issues.

In the 117th Congress, Tim serves on the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the House Education and Labor Committee.

  1. Rate his overall performance as an elected official

    1. Totally Disapprove. He's Terrible
    2. I really don't care... I'm Neutral
    3. I approve! He's doing a great job.
    1 votes
    Share Your Result
  2. He properly represents my views on Abortion Rights

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  3. He properly represents my views on Balancing the Budget

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  4. He properly represents my views on the Gun Rights (2nd Amendment)

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  5. He properly represents my views on Military & Defense Spending

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  6. He properly represents my views on the Economy

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  7. He properly represents my views on Education

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  8. He properly represents my views on Healthcare

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  9. He properly represents my position on Immigration

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  10. He properly represents my views on Energy Policy

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  11. He properly represents my views on Environmental matters

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  12. He properly represents my views on Crime and Law Enforcement

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  13. He properly represents my views on National Security

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  14. If he runs for office again, I would vote for him

    1. Uhhh, No chance!
    2. Heck Yeah!
    2 votes
    Share Your Result

Comments

comments